Category Archives: Reading

A word (or two) about hybrids

They were the very first hybrid sport utility transportation. Mules. That’s what I’m talking about. To a lot of people, mules represent the best possible example of that beast we call hybrid. And although it’s true they can’t reproduce like us — and the birds and the bees — they can be cloned.

It seems poetic justice. Mules are, after all, products of humans meddling with nature. The first mules may have been happy accidents, results of horses and donkeys being kept in (domesticated) closer proximity than they would maintain in their wild state. Whatever the history, the future holds the possibility of making exact duplicates of the best mules, or allowing bloodlines to carry on well past the prime breeding lives of the original sire and dam.

I think it’s way cool. I love mules. Maybe it’s the big ears. Zebras also have big ears. That must be it.

But mules are no more than a small tip of a giant hybrid iceburg. We make hybrids all the time. Agriculture is full of them. Seedless grapes (yum). My Mr. Lincoln roses. Disease and pest resistant grains. The list goes on.

Now we have cars with hybrid engines that run on gasoline or electric batteries, or that can use gasoline made from petroleum products or alcohol distilled from corn cobs. A lot of us make our own hybrids. I have an old lamp in the living room — a torchierre — that used to take a three-way light bulb. I turned the knob once for low light, again for brighter light, and a third time for strong reading light. That was the option before dimmer switches came along. Now there’s a chain in place of the knob. I pull the chain, and a compact flourescent bulb lights up — and uses a small fraction of the power needed by the old bulb on it’s lowest setting. And I still have my antique torchierre. Cool, huh?

I’ve been reading a book that I first read about twenty years ago, and will probably talk about again. The Lives of a Cell, By Lewis Thomas is a collection of essays he wrote for the New England Journal of Medicine (1971 – 1973) generally titled “Notes of a Biology Watcher.” One of his essays is titled “Some Biomythology” in which he talks about various mythical hybrid beasties (think of the hippogryf that Harry Potter rode). He makes the point that, given what we now know about genetics and the mechanisms of evolution, these creatures could never exist, except in our imaginations. The intriguing question, though, is “why do we create them?” Are we manifesting artistic expresssions of a basic part of our own nature — that we are all patchwork quilts made up of scraps and leftovers of other organisms? Because throughout the book, Thomas returns to the notion that each human being is really a community. And in this essay he makes a particular point that there are organisms , recently discovered (at that time), that rival anything we’ve dreamed up historically to place in these bestiaries of impossible hybrids.

Keeping in mind that he was writing these essays in the first years following the publication of The Origin of Eukaryotic Cells (1970), a book by Lynn Margulis that brought together all the data and made the definitive case for seeing the cells that make up Homo sapiens as co-ops of previously separately living organisms, it’s easy to see his fascination with the idea, and why he keeps returning to it. For most of us, these days, it’s no more outlandish an idea than that the universe is expanding, or that the earth orbits the sun.

In the essay, “Organelles as Organisms,” Thomas opens with the observation that this revolution in biology has caused little upheaval — that, in fact, “Questions about the merits of genetic engineering, the cloning of desirable human beings from single cells, and even, I suppose, the possibility that two heads might actually be better than one, are already being debated at seminars.”

Lewis Thomas died in 1993, so he missed the first successful cloning of a large mammal — Dolly the sheep — in 1996. Judging by the amount of humor he showed throughout the book, I think he would have been highly amused in 2003 when the most successful cloning effort to date produced Idaho Gem, Idaho Star, and Utah Pioneer — three identical MULES!

Who's a geek?

So I went to the library at the local university the other evening to get a book that wasn’t available at either of the local public libraries. I went after 5 p. m. so I could park in a lot and not have to pay (like in the Visitors Parking Garage) and not get a ticket, since school is out and most of the lots are mostly empty.

It didn’t take me long to get the book. I knew what floor it was on and had the call number written down because I had looked it up on line a few weeks ago. And I wasn’t parked that far from the library so didn’t have to walk clear across campus in the scorching heat. Everything was fine, until I got hit with this huge wall of nostalgia. It nearly flattened me. I practically moaned out loud.

I blew it. I blew it so bad. I blew it in so many ways I can’t even begin to enumerate.

I love being on a campus, would love a reason to spend every day working there, walking around all the different buildings, soaking up all the scholoarly vibes. I should have gone back to graduate school. Got a doctorate. Become a professor. Or something. Anything for the chance to work and spend my days on a college campus.

Anyway — the book. Just a Geek, by Wil Wheaton. I’d seen it on his blog and got curious enough to go looking for it. It took me all of about eight hours to read, although some of the blog excerpts I’d already read, so could skim through those at warp nine.

Oh. Yeah. That Wil Wheaton. Who played Wesley Crusher on Star Trek The Next Generation — a geeky kid played by (apparently) an authentically geeky kid who grew into a geeky adult and wrote a book about it all. I found it highly entertaining, engaging, and something I could relate to… almost too much.

Wil had a demon he named “Prove To Everyone That Quitting Star Trek Wasn’t A Mistake,” and as I got to know the two of them through the pages of his book, I noticed someone I’d been ignoring for years, sitting a little behind me, drumming her fingers — “I Never Should Have Left The Zoo.” Oh, brother.

When I first started working at the Fort Worth Zoo I walked around thinking all day, “Pinch me. Make sure I’m not dreaming. Make sure I’m awake, because I don’t want to miss a single nanosecond of this.” And I returned to that theme frequently for the entire three years eight months I worked there. So why did I leave? Along with the considerable philosophical differences I had with a few co-workers and with the individuals who ran the place, I had a plan to finish my Master’s degree and rule the world. I was going to be a SCIENTIST!

The assistant director of the zoo laughed at me when he heard me say that. Laughed. At me.

I, of course, had no idea that getting a Master’s degree wouldn’t make me a scientist. In fact, a Master’s degree doesn’t really make you qualified for a lot of better jobs than a Bachelor’s degree does. It just makes you overqualified for a lot more.

So it might be a little like what Wil Wheaton went through trying to find acting jobs in the post Star Trek phase. Having a hard time finding a good fit as a “journeyman” as opposed to an “apprentice,” but not quite to the level of “master” (which for me would be that PhD)where you can write your own ticket, as it were. But-oh-well.

I did have to kind of laugh at Wil when he said in the book how scary it was to contemplate a complete career redirect in his mid twenties! I changed career paths at thirty, and again at forty, and now in my fifties I’m still not sure I’m grown up enough to decide what I want to do with my life! But to Wil Wheaton, if he should read this — I really enjoyed your book, think you should keep writing, hope you keep getting acting jobs because you enjoy that, and I plan to watch you on Leverage this week. Dude.

Books about writing by someone who knows

Not long ago I re-read William Zinsser’s On Writing Well, a book that was required reading for the writing course I took through Long Ridge Writer’s Group. This time I read with a red pen in hand to underline key passages and fix in my brain the high points of the wealth of knowledge it contains.  Among all the common sense advice, Zinsser mentions another book he wrote – Writing About Your Life.  I went out and bought a copy.  I thought it might help me with my novel, which is kind of a fantasy memoir about my years in the Air Force.  And yes, it will.

I highly recommend Writing About Your Life to anyone who has even the vaguest notion of one day writing a memoir, whether factual or fictional.  For one thing, it is an excellent example of the genre.  Zinsser has some hugely entertaining stories from his own life that he tells to illustrate how to.  Did you know that his great grandfather, William Zinsser, founded a shellac business in Manhattan and that he still sometimes gets calls asking advice about paints, solvents, and shellac?  Or that he wrote the first, long magazine piece introducing a new comic to the public in the early sixties?  The comic was Woody Allen.

A word that shows up in this book more than once, that some of us need to turn into a mantra for our writing life is “permission.”  Give yourself permission to write your own story, as honestly and authentically as only you can.

Since the format of a blog lends itself particularly well to self-revelation, I would also recommend the book to anyone writing or planning a blog. Unless you are going to have one of those blogs where you tell people how to use a digital camera, train for a triathalon, or walk like an Egyptian, chances are you will be writing about the stuff you’ve done and seen in your life. This book has some great tips on how to bring out the humor, the drama, the suspense in your story, and the personalities of the other people you’ve known along the way.

If you are looking for references to add to your library on how to improve your writing, the first book I mentioned is also invaluable. Originally published in 1976, it is now in it’s seventh edition, and is considered a “classic guide to writing nonfiction.”

I know that spontaneity is supposed to be the heart of the blogoshpere, but as more and more people jump in, it will be the well thought out, consistently well written blogs that people will keep coming back to. At least that will be true for people like me. I notice multiple grammar mistakes, multiple spelling errors, and don’t have the patience to wade through those for whatever gems of wisdom they may be masking. I can find better writing about the same subject on another blog. And I will.

There is a third book by William Zinsser that I also recommend. It’s titled Writing to Learn, and it has lessons for anyone who writes anything on any subject for any reason. Need I say more?

My Sweet Little Girl…

…or, how to manage a psychotic neurotic dysfunctional dog.

She would like to be addressed as “Your Royal Highness,” I’m sure.  Although I think that when I call her “You Heinous Bitch,” she thinks it’s the same thing.  She’s not a big dog.  She’s even quite small for a basenji.  And she seems to have that “Toy Dog Syndrome.” Always in a frenzy.

According to her breeder, she quit growing at age four months, and refused to gain weight no matter how much she ate.  She also refused to hold still.  When she was out in a run, she was always on the go, trotting up, trotting back.  Susan said she saw her up in one of the chairs lying down ONCE.  I got her when she was four years old.

She became a house dog, and a couch potato.  She had to plant herself on the couch to keep her old uncle Crazy Eddie off of it.  She took up about as much room on the couch as a coaster, but she had to have the whole thing.  Good thing she’s terminally cute.   That little puppy face with the big eyes and the great big ears is about all that lets her get away with what she does.  That, and she loves me a whole lot — I know she does.

When old uncle C.E. went on to the happy howling ground, I didn’t know what I was going to do with Her Royal Highness, as she couldn’t seem to adapt to not having a lackey to abuse.  She MADE me drive all the way to North Carolina to get her old daddy. Apparently she had trained him some while she was still living in the kennel, herself, and the Old Guy remembered.  Or he just expects to be abused and never offers any argument.

At least HRH seemed happy with the arrangement — that is until I got THE PUPPY.  With three dogs I decided the time had come for an outdoor container.  I had a 20 foot by 30 foot dog pen built and furnished it with a dog house, water bucket, hay bales to climb on, and a tarp for shade in hot weather (now they have a permanent shade structure built of plywood that won’t shred in the wind, and the Puppy thinks it’s his personal sun deck).

While she’s outdoors, HRH is subjected to all sorts of sensory stimuli that keeps her on the ragged edge of collapse a lot of the time.  At first, I had to just bring everybody inside.  That whole being in the house without her whipping boy made her almost as insufferable as it was to watch her run in mindless circles around the yard.  Now though, since the Old Guy has had two strokes in two years, and is so unsteady on his feet that I’m afraid he’ll stumble into her in the middle of the night and turn her into a snarling, shrieking menace, I confine him to his crate when he’s in the house (in another bedroom).  Needless to say, the same goes for the Puppy, whose very existence seems to be affront to her royal heinousness.

So she has had to adjust to being on her own in the house.  And I have to say, I think she has come to see the advantage in having all the attention. (Duh)  So much so that I can bring her in the house and leave the boys outside when she’s having one of her little fits, or if I have to run an errand, and won’t be home to prevent one of her little fits from carrying her off.  Her not being as young and resilient as she once was.

I guess what it all boils down to is, yeah, I could have gone to all the expense and effort to have her professionally rehabilitated, but you know, she was always more amusing in her attempts to be alpha bitch — like she secretly knew she just couldn’t pull it off — and I knew all I had to do was outlast her.  After all, my first basenji was also a female.

And Now for Something Completely Different…

I have been slacking on the painting, and now I have found another awesome cat portrait to reinterpret artistically  The work is backing up.

But I had to read a couple of books — historical research for my blog, you see.  The first book, The Mote in God’s Eye, by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle, is one I read a long time ago…in 1980.  I was taking summer classes at the local university, and decided to take “The Literature of Science Fiction” as an elective. I was also taking an astronomy class, so I thought the sci-fi would be a nice complement.

So, The Mote was one of the assigned readings, and it really stuck with me — especially the “Crazy Eddie” bits.  And I quote: “Renner, I must tell you of a creature of legend….We will call him Crazy Eddie, if you like…Always he does the wrong things for excellent reasons.  He does the same things over and over, and they always bring disaster, and he never learns” (my emphasis).

There were many other details from the book that I remembered — perhaps better than I have remembered other books over the years.  But “Crazy Eddie” was special.  My second basenji was Crazy Eddie incarnate.  He was the sweetest-tempered, most insane dog I’ve ever known.  He was the original Crazybasenji, and the book was the inspiration for that name.

When I went to the library to look for the book, I discovered that there was a sequel — The Gripping Hand that had been published almost 20 years after the first.  That’s a long time to wait for a sequel, but the first book didn’t necessarily require one.   It was nice, though to see the story carried forward.  The time elapsed in the book was about the same as that between two books publication dates.

I’ve read a lot of science fiction in my time, but, prior to that summer, I had restricted myself to a few authors that wrote the kinds of stories I liked.  I started off with The Hobbit, and The Lord of the Rings, like a lot of people do.   Then I found the Earthsea trilogy by Ursula K. LeGuin.  And there was Anne McAffrey, who wrote the Dragonrider books.  These were actually more in the fantasy genre than they were science fiction.  After I took the class in science fiction, I was more willing to try other authors.  But not that many.

I told a friend at school about The Mote in God’s Eye, and she loaned me a copy of Lucifer’s Hammer, also by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle.  Later I read a couple of their Ringworld books.

Then I discovered C.J. Cherryh.  For years I consumed a steady diet of her books — I read Downbelow Station probably three times (and I don’t re-read books much), and the Chanur books at least twice.  About the time I caught up with what she was writing currently, and had to wait for the next book in the series to be published, I got frustrated and switched to non-fiction.  You don’t have to deal with all that trilogy or series delay between books bullshit with non-fiction.  And you can put the damn thing down from time to time, like to eat.

I’m not an ace book reviewer.  But I’ve found that if I write something about a book, I’ll remember it better.  With the kind of non-fiction I read, remembering not just the general theme of the book, but specific details, helps me understand my field of biology better.   So I’m going to publish some of my book reviews on my blog.  I may even write one about “Crazy Eddie” and company.